Seed-stage venture capital funds consistently deliver superior returns to their later-stage counterparts.

The reason isn't just timing. It's structural: earlier entry points, higher ownership, and the ability to double down on winners create return profiles that larger, later-stage funds struggle to match.

Understanding the advantage

Across market cycles and geographies, seed-stage venture funds have quietly outperformed. According to pooled data, they've delivered returns up to 8% higher annually than funds investing later in the startup lifecycle. Yet much of the capital – especially institutional – continues to flow toward growth-stage investments.

For sophisticated investors, understanding why this imbalance exists is more than academic. It's an opportunity to build portfolios where the structural maths are in their favour.

The entry point multiplier

Early-stage investors buy in when valuations are low and upside is highest. It's a simple equation: the earlier the entry, the greater the multiple on exit.

Consider two investors in the same company. The seed investor buys in at a $3 million valuation. The Series B investor enters at $50 million. If the company exits at $300 million, the seed investor achieves a 100x return. The Series B investor earns just 6x.

This isn't theoretical. Canva, one of Australia's most successful tech companies, raised its earliest rounds below $40 million. Those early investors realised extraordinary returns – long before most investors could access the opportunity.

Capturing the steepest growth curve

The first 18 months of a startup's commercial life are often its fastest. Going from $100,000 to $1 million in annual revenue is a 10x leap. That same company, growing from $10 million to $20 million, achieves just 2x – despite a higher absolute increase.

Seed investors enter before growth compounds. They're positioned to ride the curve, not just arrive after it.

And because seed cheques are smaller, investors can back a broader set of companies – casting a wide net early, then concentrating capital where results justify it. This dynamic works even better when fund size supports this approach.

The compounding advantage of follow-on rights

Seed investors aren't locked into a single decision. Through pro-rata rights and structured follow-on investing, they can double down on winners and let underperformers dilute.

This creates a portfolio model where optionality matters as much as selection. A fund might invest $100,000 in a pre-seed round, then $150,000 six months later, and another $200,000 after product-market fit is established. Each round benefits from deeper insight, stronger alignment, and more conviction.

Later-stage funds typically make large, binary bets. They arrive once risk has shifted from zero to one – but also after much of the value creation has occurred.

Risk isn't the enemy. It's the design.

Yes, seed-stage portfolios include more failures. But that's the point.

Venture capital operates on power law dynamics. In a well-constructed portfolio, two or three companies will drive the majority of returns. The rest? They're optionality. Their role is to exist in case they break out — not because they all need to succeed.

This asymmetry is what enables 20-30% fund-level IRRs over a decade. The key is structure, not perfection – which becomes clearer when you understand how venture returns actually work.

Why this matters more in Australia

The imbalance is even starker here.

Only 7% of Australian VC funding goes to seed-stage companies, according to the 2024 State of Australian Startup Funding report. Yet this is where the most outsized returns are generated — particularly as local companies tap into international markets and trigger valuation re-ratings.

Seed investors can access this arbitrage. Later-stage funds often arrive after it's priced in.

Add to that the tax efficiency of ESVCLP structures and a growing volume of global capital entering at Series B and beyond, and the local opportunity becomes clear: the seed stage isn't just high-upside — it's high-leverage.

Seed-stage investing during downturns

When the market cools, seed gets even stronger.

Unlike growth-stage companies, early-stage startups aren't under pressure to show profitability or defend inflated valuations. They build in the shadows, often at more attractive prices.

Historically, funds raised during downturns outperform. Investors willing to enter at seed during these periods often capture companies at their most undervalued — and participate in their full lifecycle of growth. The timing question that worries many investors is often less relevant at seed stage.

Building alpha through stage selection

For investors allocating to venture capital, stage matters as much as manager.

Seed-stage funds offer:

• Earlier and cheaper access to equity
• More touchpoints to compound exposure
• More control over portfolio construction
• Better alignment with founders during formative years
• A stronger position to ride the entire arc of value creation

This is not a strategy for every investor. It requires patience, comfort with volatility, and belief in the long game. But for those willing to lean in, the math — and the results — are hard to ignore.

‍

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5

Heading 6

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Block quote

Ordered list

1. Item 1
2. Item 2
3. Item 3

Unordered list

• Item A
• Item B
• Item C

Text link

Bold text

Emphasis

^Superscript

_Subscript